Bible history research

Carrying on from our recent possible discoveries relating to the book of Judges and other Biblical books.
We have had to leave allempires history forum after the enemy kept wrongly subtly attacking us there constantly falsely making themselves out to be all right gods and us all wrong dogs.
In that forum we recently posted tentative theories that Cushan-rishathaim might match Hammu-rabi, and Sisera might match Seqenenre (similar head wounds), and Abimelech in Judges might match Ahmes 1 (18th dynasty of Egypt), and Tutankhamun might be connected with Uriah.
Todays very tentative proposal is that Adonibezek of Judges 1 might match Ishkibal of Sealands.

Adoni-bezek means "lord of Bezek", and Bezek's name means "lightning". It is possible that Adonibezek might be conected with Baalbek in the Syria/Lebanon area? Adonibezek conquered 70/72 kings, and 70/72 is symbolic of the world (70/72 nations in Gensis 10), so he might possibly be also found in Mesopotamian imperial king lists? In the Mesopotamian king lists we found that possible candidates for Adoni-bezek are either Kudur-mab(i)uk of the West/Elam/Larsa/Kazallu, or Ammi-saduga of Babylon, or Ishki-bal/Saharki-bal/Saxarki-bal of Sealands (Sahasra-bala in the Indian lists). (Though it might be possible that Adonibezek is a corrupt/confused memory of the later Abdi-heba of Jerusalem in the Amarna letters?) Since Moses was in the 12th dynasty, and since Babylon 1 dynasty has a synchronism with the 13th dynasty, this means the early judges period is around about the time of Isin/Larsa to Babylon 1 to Sealands 1 dynasties. (Our enemies try to claim that the dates don't match according to their chronology, but the truth is their chronology has some wrong claims. There is no true proof that the orthodox ascribed dates are what they claim them to be, and there is quite a lot of evidences that the orthodox dates are wrong because they don't match various evidences and sources like the bible etc, while some of us have found matches in different times/dynasties.) It so happens that in the Indian king lists which have matches with the Sumerian king list we find that Ammisaduga is the 71st king, and Ishkibal is the 73rd king which might possibly relate to the 70/72 kings that Adonibezek claimed to have conquered? Ishkibal is the most likely candidate to possibly match/be Adonibezek. The Sealands dynasty might be connected with Canaan/Palestine/Israel during the Judges period? Ammisaduga has some possible similarities to Adonibezek though. Ammi might be closer to Adoni? The element saduga means "serpent (of the deep and/or clouds)" which could be similar to bezek "lightning" and/or sobek/sebek "crocodile"?

We might possibly be wrong about this, but some of our discoveries are pretty certainly not wrong and we have plenty of evidences that confirm our Egyptian-Biblical-Mesopotamian chronology is much closer to the truth than the orthodox chronology. The enemy doesn't want people to know/find the truth and/or they try to monopolise and esoterise the privelege of discovering the truth. Whatever things we might be wrong about, don't let the enemy deceive you and stop you objectively considering our biblical matches.